So, it would seem as if one of the many reoccurring themes of my summer would be cheating; no, not cheating on a test (although that will probably be the topic of another post), but cheating on one's boyfriend/girlfriend/partner/boo baby/etc. Now, don't go jumping to any conclusions! The issue actually arose at the very beginning of the summer when two of my close friends were involved in relationships where someone had
allegedly cheated. Of course there was suspicion, accusation, fighting, loss of friends, and all of the really horrible events that accompany cheating; however, it seemed that what no one could agree upon was what cheating
was exactly. No one could give a precise definition, and if they tried they certainly couldn't come to an agreement with anyone else. Everyone seems to have their own ideas and preconceptions. So there I am, trying to be mediator in a situation of which I only know one side. Of course I want to tell my friend that what she did wasn't cheating and that everyone else is just being a bitch, but come on, a home wrecker's a home wrecker no matter what term you prefer. And naturally I want to tell a friend that what she did is acceptable because in her head the relationship was over, but guess what hunny, it wasn't over! So where does one draw the line? Is it with a kiss? Making out? Having sex (there's a whole other definition to fight over)? And what about dating someone else while not getting physical? When does it go from a friendly dinner to a date? When are they
too close? I fear I may be asking questions that have no answer.
The ultimate tragedy, I feel, is that not only are relationships ended by suspicion taken too far, but entire groups of friends are torn apart. People feel the need to choose sides, that they must believe their friend simply because she's their friend, as if he or she could never mess up. They choose sides based on one perspective, rarely hearing both sides of the argument. They choose sides and by doing so divorce themselves from opposing parties, ending possibly decade-long friendships over a simple yet exaggerated break-up.
So, where do I fit into all of this? Well, this summer has been the first time that cheating has ever been an option. Yes, I've been in a relationship for 8 months, but this is the first time I've ever been in a relationship
and been away from my boyfriend. To put it plainly, this is the first time that temptation has ever been, well, tempting. So, here I am in Cape Town, aka hookup central, trying to figure out
what cheating is, what cheating
isn't, and how to know the difference. My intention is not to go as far as I can without crossing the line; it's just that I'm confused! So, I've began asking around. Asking people who are in relationships, who've broken up, who've cheated and who've been cheated on. I ask, "what is cheating?," "If your signifcant other cheated, would you want to know?," "If you found out he/she cheated, would you want to know?," and on and on. I've found that in this case results may vary and rather drastically. So, I took it to class and allowed Anre to mediate.
I was a little surprised at how passionate people were on the issue. Some because they had been cheated on themselves, and others, I would imagine, because they've thought a lot about it. So, he asks the class if we were to cheat, would we tell our significant other if we knew that it would end the relationship immediately. 12 out of 14 of us raised their hands. Unsurprisingly, I was one of the two not to. Now, before you assume I'm a cheating skank, let me explain. I'd love to be the first person to say that if I ever cheated I would immediately call home and confess, but I can't say that because I've never been in that situation. It's easy to say that you'd do the right thing, but it's often incredibly difficult to actually do it. [on a side note, this reminds me of a conversation we had at Kruger regarding abortion when one of the girls said that they could never do it, and another responded by asking if she'd ever had a pregnancy scare. let me just say that it puts things into perspective pretty quickly] So, there I was looking like a cheating whore, as the class pass judgment (really though, I'm pretty sure it would be the first or even the hundredth time they passed judgment on me so at this point what have I got to lose?) and I try to explain myself in the oncoming barrage of glares and stares. Finally, I make my point that unless someone had in fact cheated before, they really had no place to be raising their hand. Well, that didn't change many minds, but at least I got my point out there. My favorite comment, however, was when one girl (I'll let you guess who) mentioned that she would tell her boyfriend, but she would play it off like it somehow wasn't her fault.
No comment.
So, then came the next question; "If your significant other cheated on you, would you want to know?" This time the response was a little more mixed, as about half raised their hands and half did not. Here, we actually some valid candidates for experience-based discussion. We had at least two girls who had been cheated on in the past, but handled it very differently. The first immediately broke up with her boyfriend and they've been on rocky terms, even as friends, ever since. The second also broke up, but within two weeks they were back together and they are still together to this day. So, who's right? Again, this reflects the different personalities apparent in the class, and also reveals the great disparity between men and women. The first girl is more conservative and openly admits to being a very jealous woman. The second is more liberal, open, and just very good at accepting whatever life brings her. I would hope to be more to the second, but we are all jaded when it comes to analyzing our own personalities. The real question, I would argue, is who's happier?
Anre followed up by asking the reasons why they broke up immediately, and everyone agreed (for once) that it was due to a lack of trust. He had broken the trust that the relationship was based on, so without it there could be no relationship. Of course, the inevitable debate followed as to whether the trust could
ever be restored, and if it could, what action or event would have to take place for restoration to occur. Pretty unsurprisingly, the first argued that no, once it is broken, it could never be restored, while the second thought that it could (and apparently has been).
I'm honestly not quite sure where I stand on this issue. I think that trust can always be restored, but both parties have to want it, and it will rarely come easily. Another really fantastic comment came from a girl who said that trust could be restored partially, but not fully, say maybe 93% (yes, that is what she said. yes, it was actually that arbitrary). So, Anre rebuts that, in his opinion, you either trust someone, or you don't; it's all or nothing and can't be in between. This is another point that I'm not quite sure I agree with. I think that there are levels of trust between two people. For example, I may trust an acquaintance with watching my things while I go to the bathroom, but I wouldn't necessarily trust them to hold all of my secrets. So, in this regard, I think that there are levels of trust. I also think that there is a minimum level of trust necessary for a romantic relationship to be functional. So, in that respect, I suppose it is all or nothing. So what if I trust someone, but not to the point of getting romantically involved again? I guess that was, in some way, Anre's point, it simply won't work.
I also think that the level of offense plays a huge part in how trust is restored. Did he drunkenly hook up at a club? Or did he repeatedly go on dates behind my back? To be honestly, I think I could fairly quickly overlook a drunken make out. I mean, I'm not going to act like I'm not a horny teenager who hasn't seen his boyfriend in two months. I am. And I know how easy it can be to go from drunkenly dancing with someone to drunkenly making out in a split second. It just happens. I'm not saying that it's excusable, just that I can understand, and I'm not saying that trust wouldn't be broken, just that it would be easier to restore. On the other hand, if someone were to go behind my back and go on dates, that would be a completely different issue. I think that the difference lies in intent. If someone makes out, the intent is to do something that's instantly gratifying because they're drunk and dumb enough to not know the difference. I get that. If someone is actively dating another, then clearly they aren't emotionally satisfied with our current relationship, and are looking to make up for that lack of satisfaction by fleeing to the arms of someone else. That's a problem. I would hope that they would be able to talk to me about it and either decide that we need to work it out or break it off, but going behind my back like that would be a complete loss of trust that would take
a lot to fix.
So, would I want to know if he cheated? I really can't say, and honestly it doesn't matter, because I'm either going to find out or not, and my desire to know or not to know probably won't make any difference. So yeah, I'd like to say that I would want to know, but as they say, ignorance is bliss.
So there's my
brief analysis lol.
Sincerely,
Jason